Видео

9:40 Most of the primitive values are actually being stored in the heap. I feel like this statement is wrong. Correct me if I am wrong. But all the primitive values are stored in Stack. I asked chat GPT too for this. Here is what I found "Primitive Values (typically small): These are stored on the stack. These values include string, number, boolean, null, undefined, symbol, and bigint. They are usually stored directly on the stack because they are simple and fixed in size. Reference Values (larger and more complex): Objects, arrays, functions, and other non-primitive values are stored in the heap. The variable holds a reference to the location in the heap where the actual value is stored. Regarding the notion of "larger" primitive values being stored in the heap, in some JavaScript engines, there may be optimizations that handle large strings or other large primitive values differently. For instance, if a string is particularly large, the engine might store it in the heap to avoid stack overflow and manage memory more efficiently."

Any plan for India ?. Would love to see you guys here 😊

Actively jealous about how good this talk is. Unacceptable that this is funny and informative at the same time.

Again congrats on this year’s edition. The program contained a nicely curated set of talks, all was taken care of, friendly people, and the vibe was just awesome. Honored that I got to be part of this. Also: I see a filled pool in those drone shots … 🕵‍♂🩳

It was really nicely organised and informative. Thanks and see you next year :)

yet another JavaScript teacher

Awesome

Great talk, a pleasure to watch, thank you!

Amazing, I'd like to learn more about it. What are the resources that you talked about at the end master 🥷?

The way she represented the concepts is fabulous. Her teaching and presentational skills are exceptional.❣

I don't know JS or react at all but this was really entertaining

common yellow tint

amazing🤩

this guy is hilarious, so much that i didn't learn anything i was just laughing the whole time. gonna have to watch again.

OOP is more versatile cz u have functions that is named of methods,and u may have constructor or just the inheritance and so much more u can imagine,function is just an element of OOP

Good and practical explanations, will try your library!

I'm no expert, just a foggy from the 90s. How is it "server rendered"? The server doesn't layout the page, the server doesn't calculate the DOM. All the server is doing is caching and pushing data. Rendering of everything else is on the client, yes?

I'm a bit miffed that, when they talk about "server-side" they specifically talk about NodeJS-exclusive solutions and static site generators instead of things that can integrate with backend frameworks (Rails, Flask, Django, etc).

I am moving away from a lot of these frameworks to web components. I got sick of the constant bullshit with vue/angular/react specific crap.

Just landed here looking for security Node talks, great to see Liran being awesome as always!

This talk is awesome! Will be definitely looking for more by Kateryna

Wow, That was super weird and cool at the same time mind blowing😍❤

FP or OOP that is the question. Anyway to me they seem equivalent. So it's obvious one isn't better than the other. Which is why OOP will never by replaced by FP since it conquered the market first.

Can you please share the additional material which was pointed out at the end of the session? Or even the corresponding slack channel would be super helpful!

Or you can use vite or parcel. They are both blazingly fast and have bare minimum to no configuration needed.

This talk is hilarious :D Love it!

:host-context() selector is depreciated I believe, there is a github issue for that.

This is very intuitive.

what a great topic, thank you

Hey Great talk thank you. One feedback: It would be great if you can share the slides or at least add links that were referenced in the slides

That is a beautiful presentation. Absolutely informative and super captivating. May I know which tools you used for this presentation?

a little bit advanced for me, but useful anyways Thanks

Many thanks Anjana, would you suggest studying functional programming to a beginner javascript student, who is normally taught object oriented programming?

HELP

good

promosm

thanks!!!!!

Great talk. Using AST manipulation for refactoring is quite powerful, though I feel like one has to make a decision whether the codebase is large enough to warrant that additional effort.

A small correction at 7:07 - node apps _can_ import ES modules. They can't import ES modules _from the CDN_ (at least not for now).

This dude is a freaking rockstar. I listened to a podcast a while back and I was like holy shit, this dude is an amazing programmer. I totally can relate to him too

skeen? or actually "scene" :P

Very interesting way to solve the problem and a nice way to explain it

Can I have the GitHub repo link of this session?

This is really the perfect presentation. I think I depended on already made frames too much before.

the crazy thing is, I discovered the redux-like coding pattern by accident while searching for ways of simplifying the logic in a game I was working on. wild 💃🏽🎊

Gracias, es una obra de arte lo que has dejado por aqui

Redux is shit, even the instructor can not find the mistake. Boilerplate is too much. Creators of redux know this so that they create redux-toolkit.

old but gold

just wow

Great overview of the key components, thanks!